RE: OT: Juniper........

From: Chan, Echo (Echo.Chan@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 23:01:31 GMT-3


   
   Hi All,
   
   Based on BSD but only BSD you can't run JUNOS. Juniper had PC versions
   for laboratory. You need Intel 10/100 Network Card. All cisco guys
   know that M20/M40/160 are much better than Cisco 12000. That's why
   UUNET migrate all backbone routers (Actually not only backbone
   routers) to junipers. Many ISPs are migrate to Juniper.
   
   Junos provides better CLI and commands semantic are similar to Cisco.
   I always try to translate Junos command to cisco equivalent.
   
   regards
   
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Andrew [mailto:arousch@home.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 8:40 AM
   To: damien; ccielab@groupstudy.com
   Subject: Re: OT: Juniper........
   
     Juniper is definitely a fat box. The OS is based on FreeBSD. If
     you are familiar with BSD then you will be right at home with
     JunOS.
     At 01:12 AM 10/4/00 +0000, damien wrote:
     
     Just wondering has anyobdy used these boxes and what are there
     feelings on Junipers Success in the Market place, whats the front
     end like.............From feedback I have received from non-biased
     Engineers; Juniper kicks ass in terms of performance but is not as
     feature rich...................
     
     I am just wondering down the road are we going to be going for
     JCIE...............I think it is wise to have experience in both,
     not to mention the money u can earn..................just
     pondering.................
     
     A lot of people are jumping on the CCIE bandwagon for various
     reasons; people looking for the challenge, the money, FA else to
     do, others ( the weird that is) looking for an avenue for
     Divorce.............etc....etc.............and hence the money is
     going down....well this is the case in the UK.............
     
     thoughts, humour, all major credit cards accepted........ :-)
     
     D
     
     
     



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:23 GMT-3