From: Frank Jimenez (franjime@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 01:32:55 GMT-3
Take a look at 'ip prefix-list' - that might lead you off into the right direct
ion....
Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738
franjime@cisco.com
At 06:30 PM 10/02/2000 -0600, you wrote:
>Hi team,
>
>I have a scenario like this
>
>
>
>R1(AS-100 )--------------R2(AS-300 )------------------------R3(AS-400)
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> R4(500)
>
>
>R1 in AS 100
>R3 in AS 400
>R4 in AS 500
>R2 in AS 300
>
>All these three routers have EBGP peering with R2 which is in AS 300
>R4 is advertising two routes 171.1.2.0 and 171.1.3.0
>The requirement is R1 should see these routes as summarised form ie :
>171.1.0.0
>whereas R3 should see both the routes without summarisation.
>
>
>if we use " bgp aggregate address 171.1.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 summary-only" in
>r2, both R1 and R3 get aggregate routes.
>So that is not the correct way. It looks like aggregate address to specified
>with respect to neighbor. But I am unable to use
>above command to a specific neighbor.
>
>Any help will be greatly appreciated
>
>Thanks
>Muthu
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:23 GMT-3