From: Cheung, Tom [JJMI-AR] (TCHEUNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 11:33:27 GMT-3
Title: RE: frame relay question
Please disregard my question. I've found the problem. I left an IP
local policy statement from a previous lab in R1 which set next hop to
another interface. Lesson learn: clear router config before starting
a new lab. Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cheung, Tom [JJMI-AR] [mailto:TCHEUNG@MEDUS.JNJ.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 12:06 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: frame relay question
I'm having problems with a frame relay hub and spoke partial mesh
configuration. The hub is to be configured as multipoint
subinterface and spoke configured with frame on physical interface
with addresses as follows:
--------------r3 (10.10.1.3
dlci 301)
r1---s0.2 (10.10.1.1) ------|
-------------- r5 (10.10.1.5
dlci 501)
I can't ping either 10.10.1.3 or 10.10.1.5 from R1 s0.2 with the
following configuration for R1 and R3:
(R5 is configured similar to r3)
R1:
interface Serial0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.20.1.2 255.255.0.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 102
!
interface Serial0.2 multipoint
ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.0.0
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.3 103 broadcast (or frame dlci 103
stmt)
frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.5 105 broadcast (or frame dlci 105
stmt)
R3:
interface Serial0
ip address 10.10.1.3 255.255.0.0
encapsulation frame-relay
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.1 301 broadcast
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
debug ip packet shows that there's encapsulation failure.
And debug frame packet shows output encap failed because of "no
map entry link 7". But show frame map shows a static map of dlci
103 mapped to 10.10.1.3 on s0.2. I tried the same configuration
on 11.2 and 11.3, same result.
What seems to be the problem?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:22 GMT-3