From: Connary, Julie Ann (jconnary@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2000 - 12:15:17 GMT-3
I looked at the solution, because the Cisco documentation calls Tunnel
interfaces virtual interfaces, but
that was the answer they were looking for. So I think the question should
say without using virtual links.
Thanks,
Julie Ann
At 11:43 AM 9/28/2000 -0300, Omar Baceski wrote:
>i think virtualinterfaces stands for subinterfaces (you can find i a seveal
>places in the cisco docs)
>so fatkid is asking you how to gain full conectivity with x.25 physical
>interfaces.
>
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Connary, Julie Ann [SMTP:jconnary@cisco.com]
> > Enviado el: Jueves, 28 de Septiembre de 2000 09:52 a.m.
> > Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Asunto: ospf virtual interfaces and non-backbone connected areas
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On www.fatkid.com their is an Expert Redistribution lab #502. The topology
> >
> > has the area backbone on the token ring interface of a
> > router. The same router is connected to an X.25 cloud of 3 routers. The
> > X.25 cloud is area 4. One of the spoke routers has an ethernet
> > on which another area resides- area 2. The lab instructions say to make
> > sure that complete ospf connectivity
> > occurs but do not use virtual interfaces to accomplish this.
> >
> > I am assuming that virtual interfaces means virtual links? So how else can
> >
> > you connect a non-backbone connected area
> > to the backbone if you do not use a virtual link?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Julie Ann
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:08 GMT-3