From: Tony Olzak (aolzak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Sep 20 2000 - 16:47:17 GMT-3
That's the thing; ip default would work but does that count as a static route?
I don't know. I'm sure if this was a real test I could ask the proctor but it's
not. Also, if that's not allowed, I need to know how to make it work without u
sing ip default on Router B.
I can't remember if I put ip classless into router B when I was doing the lab.
I'll have to double-check whenever I can get back on.
Tony
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Nnanna Obuba <obuba@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>can you use ip default network ?..if allowed, that
>would work if used on the igrp domain.
>secondly make sure 'ip classless ' is enabled on the
>igrp router too.
>
>hope this helps
>
>Nnanna
>
>--- Mary Weidner <aolzak@buckeye-express.com> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I am working on a practice lab on one of the midwest
>> channels racks and am having a problem with
>> redistribution. Here's a sample config:
>>
>> Router A
>> !
>> router ospf 100
>> network 172.17.59.32 0.0.0.15 area 0
>> network 172.17.59.48 0.0.0.15 area 2
>> network 172.17.59.64 0.0.0.63 area 3
>> redistribute igrp 100 metric 64 subnets
>> !
>> router igrp 100
>> network 172.17.0.0
>> redistribute ospf 100 metric 64 10 255 1 1500
>>
>>
>>
>> Router B
>> !
>> router igrp 100
>> network 172.17.0.0
>> !
>>
>> Here's the deal, IGRP does not understand VLSM which
>> is what is being used on router A with OSPF. From
>> all the docs I've read, you would have to put in
>> static routes on Router B to tell it how to get to
>> those other subnets, except I'm not allowed to use
>> static routes. The subnets in OSPF on Router A are
>> not redistributing into IGRP. They come out as
>> 172.17.0.0 instead of whatever the real network
>> number is.
>>
>> Here's the other thing I tried; I added these lines:
>>
>>
>> Router A
>> !
>> router ospf 100
>> default-information originate always
>> !
>> router igrp 100
>> default-information allowed in 1
>> default-information allowed out 1
>> !
>> access-list 1 permit any
>>
>> Router B
>> !
>> router igrp 100
>> default-information allowed in 1
>> !
>> access-list 1 permit any
>>
>> The thinking here was to originate a default route
>> (0.0.0.0) from Router A in OSPF and try to
>> redistribute this into IGRP..... it didn't work.
>> Maybe I just configured it wrong or maybe it's just
>> not possible. I don't know. This is the second time
>> I've attempted to get this working to no avail. Let
>> me know if you have any ideas.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tony Olzak
>>
>> BTW-I've just joined the list. I'm scheduled to take
>> the test on Nov 19-20 in RTP.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:59 GMT-3