From: cdmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue Sep 19 2000 - 23:15:23 GMT-3
---------------------- Forwarded by Christine D Murray/AUSYD1/APFAS/AU on
20/09/2000 11:20 AM ---------------------------
<Graphic image not retained>
Christine D Murray
20/09/2000 12:12 PM
To: kirk@thebollingers.net @ internet@SSBT
cc:
Subject: Re: Yeah! <DocLink: Christine D Murray>
Kirk,
I am applying the 80/20 rule here.
Concentrating 80% on core topics i.e. all major routing & routed
protocols,switching,bridging
and troubleshooting and 20% on "all others" , relying heavily on the CD
for these ones.
But then I have already failed the Lab once so you may not want to use my
model.
Confidence plays a major role, I think it's a human nature thing, so if you
have your major topic
skills well honed , it acts like a "catalyst" in those vital first few
hours that set the platform
for the duration of your lab - my opinion only.
There is a Practice Scenario at "fatkid.com" for multicasting - it's a
basic one though.
I wish you well .
Chrissy
<Graphic image not retained>
kirk@thebollingers.net on 19/09/2000 07:37:53 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com @ internet
cc: kirk@thebollingers.net @ internet
Subject: Yeah!
How much multicast is everyone studying for the lab?
I would think that igmp, cgmp and mayber pim dense is sufficient.
OR, am I taking a chance.
-Kirk
Lab Oct 11/12/00
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:58 GMT-3