From: Robert LaGrasse (rlagras1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 15 2000 - 07:37:22 GMT-3
The labs aren't always well written, clear and/or consise, and there is often
more than one way to resolve an issue while staying within the criteria
presented in the problem. The proctor needs to be able to understand the how's
and why's and clarify issues presented in the lab (without giving the answer
away). What you configure may not be exactly what the test writer had in mind
when the lab was written, but if you can explain it to a proctor who
understands what's going on with the technology, you might get credit for it.
-B
On Tue, 21 Oct 2036, Scott wrote:
> I don't think proctors dont really need to be CCIE's they have a list of
> commands they type in and compare the responce to the expected results. If
> you they dont get the responce listed then its wrong. That way the lab isn't
> as subjective even though the proctors still have some flexability. Also, it
> doesn't tkae a CCIE to say, "I can't answer that you have to figure that out
> on your own."
>
>
> Scotty
>
> Timur.Mirza@Notes.airtouch.com wrote:
>
>
>
> agreed...i have had to experience major anxiety & depression to the max b4
> the
> second attempt...my 1st attempt was in jun & i had to wait 'til october! they
> need to open up more testing centers...also, i heard that most of the
> proctors
> are not ccie themselves - if that's true, man, whats up w/ that!!?? timur
>
>
>
>
>
> "Roger Wang" <rwang@genuity.net> on 09/14/2000 10:44:33 AM
>
> Please respond to "Roger Wang" <rwang@genuity.net>
>
>
>
> To: "cciemail" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> cc: (bcc: Timur Mirza/Corporate/AirTouch)
> Subject: RE: Lab Date 8/22
>
>
>
> I'm also very frustrated when it comes to scheduling my 2nd attempt. I even
> thought about flying 12 hours to Sao Paulo just because they have earlier
> dates open. It's not very fair, I think, when you can't even schedule to be
> tested without first waiting for 4 months! I don't mind failing the exam,
> but I want to fail it whenever I feel like to! :)
>
> It does appear that most people have already taken the exam at least once.
> That means the waiting list is going to get longer and longer because the
> number of people retaking the exam is growing.
>
> Rog
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> shotcaller30
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 9:31 AM
> To: cciemail; David Ankers
> Subject: Re: Lab Date 8/22
>
>
> I'm sorry guys. It was supposed to a be a joke , because of all the
> late dates people are trying to swap out. I don't want to cause any
> confusion though. I think the lab is scheduling for Jan now as far as I can
> tell. BTW, anyone know the recent for the recent bump up in wait time?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Ankers
> To: shotcaller30
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 5:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Lab Date 8/22
>
>
> Wow!! Is Halifax secduling for May already!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> I booked my CCIE 3 weeks ago and could only get jan the 8th in Halifax so I
> went for SJ on Dec 11th, maybe I should book my second attempt now! This
> must be an attempt by Cisco to keep the numbers down as no way can 4 months
> worth of people book the lab in 3 weeks. Good luck finding a swap
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: shotcaller30
> To: cciemail
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 9:20 PM
> Subject: Lab Date 8/22
>
>
> I have a lab date for May 22 and 23rd in Halifax that I want to
> trade for November. I will take the best offer. Hurry because this should
> go fast ;)
>
>
>
>
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > Attachment: att1.htm
> > MIME Type: text/html
> > ---------------------------------------------
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:56 GMT-3