From: David Ankers (d.ankers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 14 2000 - 17:23:18 GMT-3
If this was a real world network, they way I've implimented this in the past
is to use authenification. Just use a common key on the routers you want to
establish a neightbor relationship with and of course a different key on the
unwanted routers.
Dave.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry Mersmann" <bmersmann@ebnetworks.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 10:08 PM
Subject: RE: OSPF unicast updates???
> I'm assuming that you mean you have 4 neighbors sitting on a broadcast
> media off a single interface... you want to only establish an
> adjacency to 2 of them.
> Try making the interface a passive-interface and then specify neighbor
> statements for each router you wish to establish an adjacency to.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Sam Munzani
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 1:41 PM
> To: Andrew; smaljure@cibernetworks.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: OSPF unicast updates???
>
>
> Now the question is.
> If unicast is specified, will it stop multicast for
> that interface? I mean if you have 4 neighbors and you
> want to setup OSPF adj. with only 2 routers, can you
> define unicast neighbors specifically?
>
> Sam
> --- Andrew <arousch@home.com> wrote:
> > OSPF will use mcast on flooding and ucast on
> > specific requested updates. I
> > am pretty sure that static neighbors will use ucast.
> >
> > At 11:52 AM 9/14/00 -0400,
> > smaljure@cibernetworks.com wrote:
> > >Hi group,
> > >
> > >Lets say we configure neighors explicitly in the
> > ospf router process.
> > >Does this mean, OSPF will not use multicasting from
> > this point onwards and
> > >do all communications using the specified
> > unicasts?? How about for DR/BDR
> > >election process?
> > >
> > >I am going to try this now and use some debugs. I
> > will let u people know
> > >the results. Thought I would find out if somebody
> > had already spent some
> > >time on this
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >Sanjay Maljure
> > >
> >
>
>
> =====
> Regards,
>
> Sam Munzani
> sam@munzani.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:56 GMT-3