From: John Conzone (jkconzone@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Sep 13 2000 - 07:57:27 GMT-3
I tried this but my clients never came up. I'll try again this weekend,
but if anyone has a working config I'd like to see it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "carl commander" <carl_commander@hotmail.com>
To: <jkconzone@home.com>; <dmcfetridge@eccinc.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 4:54 AM
Subject: Re: Lane without LECS part......(I lost track)
> Hi,
>
> You do not need a lecs for a lane-client to join an ELAN.
> The easy alternative is to manually configure the LES NSAP address for the
> lane-clients elan.
> ie,
> on the lane interface tell the client where to find the LES, thus
bypassing
> the requirement of consulting the LECS database.
>
> int atm0.1 multipoint
> lane client ethernet elan1
> lane server-atm-address xx.nsap.addr.esss.00
>
> Im not quite sure on my syntax (I havent configured it for a while) but
> you will find that this will work.
> The first mandatory atm vc lec to lecs is not a requirement of lane but
> purely makes administration of multiple elans easier to manage.
> You would'nt want to be manually configuring a large ATM LANE network with
> fiddlly erronous NSAP addresses!!
>
> Carl
> CCIE #5934
>
>
>
> >From: "John Conzone" <jkconzone@home.com>
> >Reply-To: "John Conzone" <jkconzone@home.com>
> >To: "Dave McFetridge" <dmcfetridge@eccinc.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: Lane without LECS part......(I lost track)
> >Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 18:50:08 -0400
> >
> > Here we go again!
> > Dave, I was of the same mind as you but numerous folks posted and
said
> >that I was incorrect, and that you can specify the LES/BUS without the
> >LECS, which I tried.
> > However it did not work. When I read the command it says it can be
> >used to override the LECS assignment of the LES/BUS/
> > I just hope I don't get LANE without a LECS because this is
confusing
> >the hell out of me!
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Dave McFetridge
> > To: John Conzone ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 8:40 AM
> > Subject: RE: Lane without LECS part......(I lost track)
> >
> >
> > John,
> > You realize you must have a LANE configuration server configured.
> >You would typically configure this on the ATM switch and clients/routers
> >would learn this via ILMI. If you don't have signaling and ILMI
configured
> >than you'll never find who is the LES for the ELAN your attempting to be
a
> >LEC for. I hope this is clear. Here are some configs to help, one with a
> >router being the LECS,LES,BUS, and LEC.. and one with the switch as the
> >LECS and the router as the LES,BUS, and LEC.
> >
> > Hope this clears things up for you....
> > Dave McFetridge
> >
> >
> > Router as LECS/LES/BUS/LEC with static entries......
> >
> > R1
> > lane database LANE
> > name 13 server-atm-address
50.111111111111111111111111.000011110001.01
> > !
> > interface ATM0/0
> > no ip address
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > atm nsap-address 50.111111111111111111111111.000011110000.00
> > atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal
> > atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi
> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> > lane config config-atm-address
> >50.111111111111111111111111.000011110003.00
> > lane config database LANE
> > lane global-lecs-address 50.111111111111111111111111.000011110003.00
> > lane client-atm-address 50.111111111111111111111111.000011110000.01
> > lane server-atm-address 50.111111111111111111111111.000011110001.01
> > lane bus-atm-address 50.111111111111111111111111.000011110002.01
> > !
> > interface ATM0/0.1 multipoint
> > ip address 137.20.224.1 255.255.255.0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > ip ospf network non-broadcast
> > lane client-atm-address 50.111111111111111111111111.000011110000.01
> > lane server-atm-address 50.111111111111111111111111.000011110001.01
> > lane bus-atm-address 50.111111111111111111111111.000011110002.01
> > lane server-bus ethernet 13
> > lane client ethernet 13
> > !
> >
> >
> > LS1010 as LECS, Router as LES/BUS/LEC.....
> >
> > LS1010#!
> > atm lecs-address-default
> >47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5c.1001.0060.3e5c.1005.00 1
> > atm address 47.0091.8100.0000.0060.3e5c.1001.0060.3e5c.1001.00
> > !
> > lane database TEST
> > name ELAN2 server-atm-address
> >47.00918100000000603E5C1001.0050732EFA03.02
> > name ELAN1 server-atm-address
> >47.00918100000000605CC9BE01.00605CC9BE03.01
> > !
> > interface ATM2/0/0
> > no ip address
> > atm maxvp-number 0
> > lane config auto-config-atm-address
> > lane config database TEST
> >
> >
> >
> > R2
> > !
> > interface ATM0
> > mtu 1500
> > no ip address
> > atm pvc 5 0 5 qsaal
> > atm pvc 16 0 16 ilmi
> > !
> > interface ATM0.1 multipoint
> > ip address 172.16.100.2 255.255.255.0
> > lane server-bus ethernet ELAN1
> > lane client ethernet ELAN1
> > !
> > interface ATM0.2 multipoint
> > ip address 172.16.200.2 255.255.255.0
> > lane server-bus ethernet ELAN2
> > lane client ethernet ELAN2
> > !
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Conzone [mailto:jkconzone@home.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 10:15 AM
> > To: ccielab
> > Subject: Lane without LECS part......(I lost track)
> >
> >
> > I've been in the archives and pulled up my old mails and I still
> >can't get LANE working without buliding a LECS and a LECS database. I
> >specified the SERVER and BUS addreses and it woudl not work until I built
a
> >LECS.
> > Does anyone have working configs of 2 routers running LANE
without
> >a LECS so I canuse them this weekend to try again?
> > Thanks!
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:55 GMT-3