From: Kevin Baumgartner (kbaumgar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 20:10:24 GMT-3
Missing some configuration on 4700
should add
bridge 1 protocol ieee
bridge 1 route ip
- Kevin
At 10:16 PM 9/12/00 +0000, you wrote:
>This seems to make sense, and it resolved my ARP problem when I tried it (my 2
600 and my 4700 learned each other's MAC addresses), but I still don't have IP
connectivity...Here's my configs....
>
>---- ------- ------ -----
>2600-E0-------CAT5500-----ATM12/1/0-LS1010-ATM12/1/2------ATM0-4700
>---- ------- ------ -----
>
>CAT5500 Lane Module:
>interface ATM0
>atm preferred phy A
>atm clock INTERNAL
>atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal
>atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi
>atm pvc 3 3 33 aal5snap
>atm bind pvc vlan 3 3
>
>LS1010:
>interface ATM12/1/2
>no ip address
>no ip directed-broadcast
>atm pvc 4 44 interface ATM12/1/0 3 33
>
>(the lane module is on atm 12/1/0, the 4700 is on 12/1/2)
>
>4700:
>interface ATM0
>no ip address
>atm max-paks-vc 40
>atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal
>atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi
>!
>interface ATM0.3 point-to-point
>atm pvc 3 4 44 aal5snap inarp
>bridge-group 1
>!
>interface BVI1
>ip address 172.16.2.2 255.255.255.0
>!
>bridge irb
>
>2600:
>interface fastethernet 0/0
> ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.0
>
>Thanks again,
>Jack Heney
>
>
>
>>From: "Scott F. Robohn" <sfr@mentortech.com>
>>To: Jack Heney <jheneyccie@hotmail.com>
>>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: Re: Cat5500 Lane question
>>Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:42:46 -0400
>>
>>Jack,
>>
>>Here's the problem: Your PVC on the LANE module is an
>>RFC1483 *bridged* PVC and the PVC on your 4700 is an RFC1483
>>*routed* PVC. tThe encapsulations must match, and the LANE
>>module only supports the bridged mode.
>>
>>You need to put the 4700 subinterface in a bridge group to
>>make that an RFC1483 bridged PVC, matching the encap on the
>>LANE module. Then you can bridge that subinterface to
>>another ethernet port on the 4700 with a PC plugged in, or
>>you can do IRB on the 4700 and put an IP address on a BVI
>>interface.
>>
>>You might want to check the archives and CCO on this; I
>>think we've covered it before.
>>
>>Scott
>>
>>Jack Heney wrote:
>> >
>> > I have a Cat5500 with a LANE module (that doesn't support an IP address
>> > assignment) and a 4700 with an ATM interface. Besides using LANE, is ther
e
>> > any way to connect these two devices? I tried creating a virtual circuit o
n
>> > my ls1010, which I then bound to a VLAN on the LANE module. I then create
d
>> > a subinterface (I tried both point-to-point and multipoint) on the router
>> > and configured the pvc on the subinterface. I think my problem is
>> > ARP-related, because the router learns MAC addresses across the virtual
>> > circuit, but the pc's plugged into the switch (via ethernet) can't learn t
he
>> > router's mac address. Am I trying to do something impossible, or am I
>> > missing something? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>> >
>> > Jack Heney
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:55 GMT-3