From: Sanjay Bhakta (sanjaybhakta@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Sep 11 2000 - 09:54:35 GMT-3
However, my understanding is that in the LAB you will not be allowed to use
static routes.
Sanjay Bhakta (RTP 9/24)
sbhakta@charter.net
sanjaybhakta@hotmail.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Ankers" <d.ankers@cable.a2000.nl>
To: "mark salmon" <masalmon@cisco.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRp and default routes
> Refer to Jeff Doyle page 751 -> 753
>
> "After a default route is identified in the routing table, RIP, IGRP and
> EIGRP will automatically advertise it. OSPF and IS-IS require some
aditional
> configuration...."
>
> Hint: You don't need to do anything :-)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mark salmon" <masalmon@cisco.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 11:34 PM
> Subject: Re: EIGRp and default routes
>
>
> > Yep. however, I had to use an access list at the end as I received an
> > incomplete command error. I then created a standard access list (
> > acess-list 1 permit any), and it stil did not work.
> >
> >
> > To test it I configured a IP network on a loopback interface on one of
> > the EIGRP enabled router. I then used the command default information
> > out under the EIGRP process.
> >
> > On one of the other routers I placed a default informatiion in command.
> > I then tried to ping the loopback interface of the original router. I
> > was unsuccessful.
> >
> >
> > Sam Munzani wrote:
> > >
> > > EIGRP is supposed to understand "ip default network" command. However
I
> have
> > > not tested it. As a matter of fact I could not make it work any way.
> > >
> > > I have not played with it but do you know the result of following
> command?
> > >
> > > Router eigrp 1
> > > default-information out ?
> > >
> > > Sam
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark Salmon
> > Cisco Systems Inc
> > Phone:773-695-8235
> > Pager:800-365-4578
> > email: masalmon@cisco.com
> > Empowering The Internet Generation.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:54 GMT-3