From: Kenneth Kriel (ken@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Sep 10 2000 - 09:58:53 GMT-3
You can try to force the router with a router id in the ospf config mode :
Use command :
router-id x.x.x.x
On Ver 12.1 ( I do not know about the other versions ! )
Try it and let us know !
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Ryan Hoffman
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:00 PM
To: 'gs'
Subject: OSPF Router ID not advertised, causing problems
What are the consequences of not advertising your RID network in ospf? See
the following cfg below. r9 is providing an EX2 default route. r11 sees
it, r10 doesn't. It's in the database, however, ready to use.
e0 e1 e0 e0
2514 ----- 4000 ----- 2514
r9 r11 r10
- all one ospf process
r10
===
ip subnet-zero
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 192.168.5.1 255.255.255.0
no logging event subif-link-status
!
interface Ethernet0
ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.128
no logging event subif-link-status
!
router ospf 1
network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.127 area 0
default-information originate always metric 10
!
ip classless
r10#sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is not set
192.168.0.0/25 is subnetted, 2 subnets
O 192.168.0.0 [110/20] via 192.168.2.1, 00:01:55, Ethernet0
O IA 192.168.0.128 [110/21] via 192.168.2.1, 00:01:55, Ethernet0
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/21] via 192.168.2.1, 00:01:55, Ethernet0
192.168.2.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 192.168.2.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
C 192.168.5.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
r10#sh ip ospf data external
OSPF Router with ID (192.168.5.1) (Process ID 1)
Type-5 AS External Link States
LS age: 149
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
LS Type: AS External Link
Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number )
Advertising Router: 192.168.0.129
LS Seq Number: 80000035
Checksum: 0xD9B7
Length: 36
Network Mask: /0
Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
TOS: 0
Metric: 2
Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
External Route Tag: 2
LS age: 164
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
LS Type: AS External Link
Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number )
Advertising Router: 192.168.5.1
LS Seq Number: 80000001
Checksum: 0x60D9
Length: 36
Network Mask: /0
Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
TOS: 0
Metric: 10
Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
External Route Tag: 1
Advertising 192.168.5.1 out fixes this. If I add 'network 192.168.5.1
0.0.0.0 area 0' to r10's 'router ospf 1' I get the following...
r11#sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate
default
U - per-user static route, o - ODR
Gateway of last resort is 192.168.0.1 to network 0.0.0.0
192.168.0.0/25 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C 192.168.0.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1
O IA 192.168.0.128 [110/11] via 192.168.0.1, 00:00:11, Ethernet1
O IA 192.168.1.0/24 [110/11] via 192.168.0.1, 00:00:11, Ethernet1
192.168.2.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 192.168.2.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
192.168.5.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 192.168.5.1 [110/11] via 192.168.2.2, 00:00:11, Ethernet0
O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/2] via 192.168.0.1, 00:00:11, Ethernet1
r10#sh ip ospf database ex
OSPF Router with ID (192.168.5.1) (Process ID 1)
Type-5 AS External Link States
LS age: 852
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
LS Type: AS External Link
Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number )
Advertising Router: 192.168.0.129
LS Seq Number: 80000035
Checksum: 0xD9B7
Length: 36
Network Mask: /0
Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
TOS: 0
Metric: 2
Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
External Route Tag: 2
LS age: 867
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
LS Type: AS External Link
Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number )
Advertising Router: 192.168.5.1
LS Seq Number: 80000001
Checksum: 0x60D9
Length: 36
Network Mask: /0
Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
TOS: 0
Metric: 10
Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
External Route Tag: 1
Why does r10 behave this way, and only for this EX2 route?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:54 GMT-3