RE: PIX security manager

From: Gils@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Sep 07 2000 - 05:49:04 GMT-3

• Next message: Forest Riek: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Previous message: Matt Lachberg 3: "RE: atm on cat atm module"
• Maybe in reply to: zhencai: "PIX security manager"
• Next in thread: Tony Medeiros: "Re: PIX security manager"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
As far as I know and i had the same problem you need sp4.

GIL
CCNA/CCDA

-----Original Message-----
From: zhencai [mailto:zhencai@home.com]
Sent: ??? ????? 06 ?????? 2000 22:45
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; cisco@groupstudy.com
Subject: PIX security manager

Dear friends,

I'm trying to load PIX security manger 1.1 on a NT4 (SP5) machine but it
asked for SP4. I tried to modify NT registry to make security manager think
it's dealing with SP4 but no success. Is there a work around? I hate to
reload everything.

Thanks a lot.

Zhen Cai

• Next message: Forest Riek: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Previous message: Matt Lachberg 3: "RE: atm on cat atm module"
• Maybe in reply to: zhencai: "PIX security manager"
• Next in thread: Tony Medeiros: "Re: PIX security manager"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:53 GMT-3