From: Tony Medeiros (tonygreat@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 01 2000 - 04:38:07 GMT-3
Don't forget to also to set your "dialer idle-timeout" to the the same or
more time as your "active" time in your snapshot client statment if you are
denying the routing protocol in you dialer-list (like you should). If you
don't , the the session times out and snapshot keeps bringing the line
back up until it reaches it's quite period.
Tony
(Posting way too much now)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Baxter" <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
To: "Maljure, Sanjay" <smaljure@cibernetworks.com>; "'Erick B.'"
<erickbe@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 10:32 PM
Subject: RE: Snapshot routing
> You'll need to add the keyword [dialer] in
> snapshot client active-time quiet-time [suppress-statechange-updates]
> [dialer]
>
> to initiate a call in the absence of normal traffic...
>
> Simon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maljure, Sanjay [mailto:smaljure@cibernetworks.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 3:28 PM
> To: 'Erick B.'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Snapshot routing
>
>
> I remember reading the config guide and it says...
>
> "These entries remain frozen during a quiet period. At the end of the
> quiet period, another active period starts during which routing
information
> is again exchanged."
>
> So snapshot is supposed to make sure that routing entries freeze in the
> routing tables during the quiet period.
>
> Actually I am going to try it out in the next couple of hours. Will let u
> guys know
>
> Sanjay
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erick B. [mailto:erickbe@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 1:10 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Snapshot routing
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Have been working on Snapshot routing tonight and
> about to hit bed. I got it working and all and my
> routes are aging out like normal. Do I need to adjust
> the timers to hold the routes in the routing table for
> the quiet time (while line is down)? I thought
> snapshot would take care of that but maybe I'm
> mistakened.
>
> Thanks, Erick
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:51 GMT-3