From: jim beam (jheneyccie@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 29 2000 - 18:28:02 GMT-3
I'm not sure about your problem with "no-summary" but I know that an area
can't be defined as both stub and NSSA...The point of NSSA is that the area
is inherently stub, but it will allow type 7 LSA's to pass through to
advertise about other autonomous systems.
Jack Heney
CCNP
>From: "Paul Borghese" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>
>Reply-To: "Paul Borghese" <pborghese@groupstudy.com>
>To: "Lawrence Dwyer" <dwyer@tatrc.org>
>CC: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: NSSA in OSPF
>Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 16:47:37 -0400
>
>I do not believe this will work (but it might I am not in front of a
>router)
>
>area 1 stub
>area 1 nssa
>
>
>Paul
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Lawrence Dwyer" <dwyer@tatrc.org>
>To: "Paul Borghese" <paul98@prodigy.net>
>Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 4:33 PM
>Subject: Re: NSSA in OSPF
>
>
> > Did you define the area as a stub first?
> > Larry
> >
> > Paul Borghese wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, this is driving me crazy. If I setup a network as an NSSA area
>using
> > > the command:
> > >
> > > area 1 nssa
> > >
> > > a default route does not get propagated by the ABR. If I enter the
> > > command -
> > >
> > > area 1 nssa no-summary
> > >
> > > a default route does get propagated into the NSSA. But Inter-Area
>routes
> > > are also propagated into the area. You would think the no-summary
>command
> > > would operate similar to that of "area 1 stub no-summary" and not
>allow
>IA
> > > routes.
> > >
> > > Plus the no-summary command under nssa is not documented in either the
>11.3
> > > or 12.1 documentation.
> > >
> > > Ok, so what is going on? What am I missing?
> > >
> > > Paul Borghese
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:32 GMT-3