From: Mark Lewis (markl11@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 17 2000 - 05:05:33 GMT-3
Hi,
Quick answer on the moving to route-reflectors question: route-reflectors
are easier to configure and it's much easier to migrate from a full ibgp
mesh to rrs than confederations (with rrs the migration can be gradual, but
with confederations you have to do it all in one go).
Hope that helps,
Mark
>From: Cisco@datastreet.com (Matt Lachberg 3)
>Reply-To: Cisco@datastreet.com (Matt Lachberg 3)
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: IBGP question
>Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 08:59:48 -0700
>
>Could one of you BGP gods give me working configs of the following:
>
>IBGP's using redundant route-reflectors
>
>IBGP's using redundant confederation peers
>
>Also, it's my understanding that both route reflectors and confederations
>are two methods for accomplishing the same thing, less IBGP peering. Does
>one have an advantage over the other? Why is the BGP world moving away
>from
>confederations and to route-reflectors?
>
>Matthew Lachberg, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:27 GMT-3