From: yujianchun (stiff.yu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 17 2000 - 03:41:43 GMT-3
no,you need bridge 1 route ip
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Lachberg 3 <Cisco@datastreet.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: 16 August 2000 13:21
Subject: IRB question
>Here is a scenario:
>
>Host1-----(E0) R1 (E1)------ Host2
>10.0.0.3/24 (E2) 10.0.0.2/24
> 10.0.1.2/24
> |
> |
> Host3
> 10.0.1.1/24
>
>What I want to accomplish is bridging IP from host 1(10.0.0.3) to host 2
>(10.0.0.2) and enabling routing for both these hosts to host 3 (10.0.1.1).
>
>#1 Can I do this with IRB, (I know if this can be done, I need to use IRB
>/w BVI)
>
>#2 Assuming #1 is yes, and I create a BVI w/ IP address 10.0.0.1/24. Is
>the following combination correct:
>
>bridge 1 route ip
>bridge 1 bridge ip (on by default)
>
>What has to happen in the end is I am able to ping from host 1 to 2 (via
>bridging) and ping host 3 (via routing) through my default gateway (The
BVI)
>
>
>Matthew Lachberg, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE formally MSCE
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:27 GMT-3