RE: BGP default network

From: Eugene Nesterenko (eenest@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 14 2000 - 05:45:49 GMT-3


   
Mark,

> 2) Why a confederation? Why not just use a private Autonomous System
number? These can be assigned
> from your ISP, and filtered out by them.

If you are looking or some kind of redundancy - i.e. have more then one
link, both solutions can work.
In most cases, if you're sitting as a leaf node and your network belongs to
the address space of your ISP
You don't need BGP at all.
My personal opinion. Kinda "Keep It Simple Stupid".

> 3) It doesn't matter what your network size is.. If you have a need for
the full routing table,
> than it doesn't matter what your public network mask is.

Sure.

> 4) I don't follow you here.. What does being lazy or having strange
management have to do with
> anything?

To be clear - if you are connected to just one ISP - you don't need BGP at
all in most cases.
Speaking about the strange management - if you're unable to push them to buy
better equipment
for the task.....

> Your analogy for running NT on a 386.. If it does what you need it to do,
why upgrade for the sake
> of upgrading?

Have you ever tried to run NT on a 386? Not just for fun...

Regards,

       Eugene

-----------------------------------------
Eugene Nesterenko, CCIE #5283, CCNP+Security, CCDP, MCSE
Fax/Voicemail: +1 415 7043497



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:25 GMT-3