From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:20:44 GMT-3
re-reading the e-mail and seeing the bottom part.., it could have been an
problem with ospf on-demand circuit that didn't involve redistributing
rip, so of course I had to open the e-mail, not just delete it.
You'll see it gets rather annoying after awhile when people ask the same
questions over and over again when it's already in the archive. It's
particularly a problem when it's rather obvious someone has just recently
taken the lab and they ask a specific question. I'm not saying that
applies in your case, it could be a coincidence.... All I'm saying is
everyone should watch NDA. I'm just repeating what others have stated
previously, I'm not the NDA police.
B.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Bill Dellamar wrote:
> Brian,
> I searched the archive. There are lots of ospf
> on-demand questions there. I didn't find one that
> related to what I was looking for in what I considered
> an acceptable use of my time. Maybe I was searching
> on the wrong topic. I am going through all types of
> redistribution scenerio's with isdn, frame, atm at the
> lower layers and rip to ospf, ospf to eigrp, etc.
> trying to prepare for my lab attempt.
>
>
> If you don't what to respond to an email or feel that
> the topic is a waste of your time, then delete the
> email - hence the subject field in the email.
>
> Bill
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:23 GMT-3