RE: ospf on demand-circuit

From: Bill Dicks (wdicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:11:47 GMT-3


   
One thing to remember is that if the topology is changing (i.e. you're
configuring things in RIP or OSPF) that cause the LSA's to change, the line
will come up to pass along the topology changes.

Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bill Dellamar
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 1:51 PM
To: ~ muska; vijaykrishna@netzero.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ospf on demand-circuit

The ethernet interface is RIP. The bri interface is
ospf. the ethernet interface is being redistributed
into ospf. If I do a show ip ospf interface, it shows
that the interface is being run as a on-demand.
However, when the link drops, OPSF brings the link
back up.

--- ~ muska <riseandfallagain@hotmail.com> wrote:
> But its OSPF LSA's bringing up the circuit, not RIP.
> OSPF LSAs will still
> bring the circuit up because it is redistributed
> from rip as a TYPE 5 LSA
> every time the bri interface changes states. If you
> use a ACL to filter out
> the bri network from being redistributed into ospf
> from rip, it should do
> the job.
> ~muska
>
> >From: "Vijaykrishna" <vijaykrishna@netzero.net>
> >Reply-To: "Vijaykrishna" <vijaykrishna@netzero.net>
> >To: "Bill Dellamar" <wdellamar@yahoo.com>,
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: ospf on demand-circuit
> >Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 10:57:33 -0400
> >
> >I could not work much on ISDN but I did see this
> problem and even when I
> >did
> >passive BRI0 in rip.
> >I blocked the rip updates traffic from the
> dialer-list, and that worked.
> >-Vj
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Simon Baxter <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
> >To: Bill Dellamar <wdellamar@yahoo.com>;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Date: Thursday, August 10, 2000 1:50 AM
> >Subject: RE: ospf on demand-circuit
> >
> >
> > >Without seeing your configs - not sure.
> > >
> > >But, is the BRI interface address included in the
> rip network statement?
> > >The passive will stop the updates going out the
> interface but won't stop
> >the
> > >route for the connected coming up, getting
> redistributed into OSPF and
> >OSPF
> > >sending an LSA for the newly learned route!
> > >
> > >Simon
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Bill Dellamar [mailto:wdellamar@yahoo.com]
> > >Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 11:47 AM
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: ospf on demand-circuit
> > >
> > >
> > >I am trying to implement ospf on-demand circuit.
> > >R2 is connected to R3 serially and is area 0.
> R3's e0
> > >is running rip. R3's bri is connected to r5's
> bri and
> > >is area 5 running ospf on-demand.
> > >
> > >It seems to work fine until I redistribute rip
> into
> > >ospf. The link keeps coming back up as soon as
> it is
> > >dropped. I know it's not an authenication
> problem
> > >because it works until I redistribute rip. It's
> not
> > >rip because I'm doing a passive-interface on bri0
> for
> > >the rip process.
> > >
> > >Anybody ever seen this before?
> > >
> > >Thanks.
> > >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:23 GMT-3