From: ~ muska (riseandfallagain@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 10 2000 - 14:40:28 GMT-3
But its OSPF LSA's bringing up the circuit, not RIP. OSPF LSAs will still
bring the circuit up because it is redistributed from rip as a TYPE 5 LSA
every time the bri interface changes states. If you use a ACL to filter out
the bri network from being redistributed into ospf from rip, it should do
the job.
~muska
>From: "Vijaykrishna" <vijaykrishna@netzero.net>
>Reply-To: "Vijaykrishna" <vijaykrishna@netzero.net>
>To: "Bill Dellamar" <wdellamar@yahoo.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: ospf on demand-circuit
>Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 10:57:33 -0400
>
>I could not work much on ISDN but I did see this problem and even when I
>did
>passive BRI0 in rip.
>I blocked the rip updates traffic from the dialer-list, and that worked.
>-Vj
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Simon Baxter <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
>To: Bill Dellamar <wdellamar@yahoo.com>; ccielab@groupstudy.com
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Date: Thursday, August 10, 2000 1:50 AM
>Subject: RE: ospf on demand-circuit
>
>
> >Without seeing your configs - not sure.
> >
> >But, is the BRI interface address included in the rip network statement?
> >The passive will stop the updates going out the interface but won't stop
>the
> >route for the connected coming up, getting redistributed into OSPF and
>OSPF
> >sending an LSA for the newly learned route!
> >
> >Simon
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Bill Dellamar [mailto:wdellamar@yahoo.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 11:47 AM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: ospf on demand-circuit
> >
> >
> >I am trying to implement ospf on-demand circuit.
> >R2 is connected to R3 serially and is area 0. R3's e0
> >is running rip. R3's bri is connected to r5's bri and
> >is area 5 running ospf on-demand.
> >
> >It seems to work fine until I redistribute rip into
> >ospf. The link keeps coming back up as soon as it is
> >dropped. I know it's not an authenication problem
> >because it works until I redistribute rip. It's not
> >rip because I'm doing a passive-interface on bri0 for
> >the rip process.
> >
> >Anybody ever seen this before?
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:23 GMT-3