RE: IPX EIGRP/NLSP Issue

From: Simon Baxter (Simon.Baxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 09 2000 - 01:54:48 GMT-3


   
   What's more :
   
   The Cisco IOS software does not automatically redistribute NLSP routes
   into Enhanced IGRP routes and vice versa. You must configure this type
   of redistribution. To do so, use the following commands, starting in
   global configuration mode:
   Step Command Purpose
   
   1 .
   
   ipx router eigrp autonomous-system-number
   
   From global configuration mode, enable Enhanced IGRP.
   
   2 .
   
   redistribute nlsp [tag]
   
   From IPX-router configuration mode, enable redistribution of NLSP into
   Enhanced IGRP.
   
   3 .
   
   ipx router nlsp [tag]
   
   Enable NLSP.
   
   4 .
   
   redistribute eigrp autonomous-system-number
   
   From IPX-router configuration mode, enable redistribution of Enhanced
   IGRP into NLSP.
   
   I'm going to have to have a think about this one... Simon
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Simon Baxter
   Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 2:53 PM
   To: 'Eric Fairfield'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
   Subject: RE: IPX EIGRP/NLSP Issue
   
   Hoped to be able to save you on this one but I got the same
   result....(although I had to substitute S1 for E0 and run IPXWAN)
   
   
   
   as you see below : 00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: 275 via 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5
   metric 4294967295
   
   even though network 275 isn't configured under IPX EIGRP.
   
   
   
   
   
   Can anyone shed any light on this??
   
   
   
   R2#debug ipx eigrp
   IPX EIGRP debugging is on
   R2#clear ipx ro *
   R2#
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: Received update from 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5 for net
   200
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: create route to 200 via 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5, metric
   2681856
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: Received update from 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5 for net
   250
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: create route to 250 via 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5, metric
   2707456
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: Received update from 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5 for net
   250
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: Received update from 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5 for net
   200
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: External 275 metric 4294967295 hop 1 delay 1
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: 275 via 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5 metric 4294967295
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: External 275 metric 4294967295 hop 1 delay 1
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: 275 via 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5 metric 4294967295
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: External 275 metric 281600 hop 1 delay 1
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: 275 via 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5 metric 4294967295
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: External 275 metric 281600 hop 1 delay 1
   00:39:20: IPXEIGRP: 275 via 210.0010.7b3a.7ac5 metric 4294967295
   
   R2#sh ipx ei int
   
   
   
   IPX EIGRP Interfaces for process 1
   
   
   
                       Xmit Queue Mean Pacing Time Multicast
   Pending
   Interface Peers Un/Reliable SRTT Un/Reliable Flow Timer
   Routes
   Se0 1 0/0 8 0/15 50
   0
   
   
   
     Simon Baxter
     Network Consultant
     Logical Networks
     simon.baxter@au.logical.com
     Phone: +61 3 9522 9203
     
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Eric Fairfield [mailto:ericfair@chorus.net]
   Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 3:06 AM
   To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
   Subject: IPX EIGRP/NLSP Issue
   
   I have R1 as the hub of my network with a couple of spokes. I have
   enabled EIGRP on the WAN and NLSP on LAN of R2 and R3. R2 and R3 are
   connected to each other via E0. E1 on R2 and R3 have an IPX network
   number also assigned them also. E0 on both R2 and R3 have IPX network
   number 225 while R2 E1 is 275 and R3 E1 is 250. These Ex interfaces
   are configured for NLSP while the S0 Frame relay interfaces are
   configured for EIGRP. I have done an IPX ROUTER RIP, NO NETWORK ALL
   to disable RIP.
   
   
   
   The problem is that R1 sees the NLSP routes of 225,250,275 learned via
   EIGRP. To my knowledge EIGRP and NLSP do not automatically
   redistribute. NLSP adjacencies are formed and NLSP routes are learned
   if EIGRP is removed.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:23 GMT-3