RE: OSPF Labs

From: Chris Jackson (cjackson69@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 08 2000 - 14:11:28 GMT-3


   
You may have no problem with distributing them, but I am sure Marc and the
court system would feel differently about it. Marc and company have spent a
considerable amount of time and research on developing fantastic labs. You
do not have the right to distribute something that you do not own (when you
purchase his labs you are simply licensed to use them. You do not own the
intellectual material). This group is not a place for that sort of activity.
I appreciate the fact that it can be expensive to pursue CCIE, but that is
also part of it's value.

Just my 2 cents

Chris Jackson
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Gary.Frye@firstunion.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 8:20 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF Labs

The lab scenario themselves are not what keeps CCIE bootcamps in business.
The big money involves time on very expensive equipment.

I have no problems accepting or distributing lab scenarios. If people have
their own equipment then they don't need the service of any practice or
virtual labs.

-garyf

---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Frye/AO/USR/FTU on 08/08/2000
08:04 AM ---------------------------

gfrye@carolina.rr.com on 08/07/2000 06:22:03 PM

 To: Gary Frye/AO/USR/FTU@FTU

 cc:

 Subject: Re: OSPF Labs

I found the CCIE bootcamp labs very good and certainly good for studying for
the
CCIE. I would however strong recommend that parts of these labs are not
distributed in this group. They are not cheap I agree but that doesn't mean
that
we should freely distribute. I think they are worth the investment.

  Kevin

At 09:27 PM 8/7/00 +0000, you wrote:
>Does anybody have any decent OSPF Labs they wouldn't mind sharing. I have
>got some ideas from fatkid, thanks to Mr. Small, but after that I am
lacking
>ideas..... Does anybody have any Labs from the CCIE bootcamp, I hear from
>the posts they are quite good, but look expensive.....
>
>Any suggestions...
>
>Thanks
>D
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:22 GMT-3