From: D. J. Jones (meganac@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 01 2000 - 00:17:58 GMT-3
ok, thanks; I understand now..dj
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Ingham" <fningham@worldnet.att.net>
To: "D. J. Jones" <meganac@home.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: ISIS inarp issue...
> You can add the command clns router isis to the interfaces in addition
> to the ip router isis command but I don't think that will solve your
> problem. Configure your interfaces as point-to-point subinterfaces
> instead of using the physical
> interfaces. See Doyle p.678, Integrated isis on nbma networks.
>
> HTH
>
> "D. J. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > Could you please explain why not? thanks.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Feliz, Edgar" <Edgar.Feliz@BTNA.com>
> > To: "Ryan Hoffman" <ryan.hoffman@telus.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 7:07 AM
> > Subject: RE: ISIS inarp issue...
> >
> > > You can not have both CLNS, and ISIS configured on an interface at the
> > same
> > > time.
> > >
> > > EF
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ryan Hoffman [mailto:ryan.hoffman@telus.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 9:49 PM
> > > To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > > Subject: ISIS inarp issue...
> > >
> > >
> > > Caslow pg 111 indicates fr inarp for iso clns is supported. I can't
get
> > the
> > > following to bring up dynamic map entries. Is it supported for osi
clns
> > > routing only, not isis?
> > >
> > >
> > > hostname r1
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0
> > > ip address 10.0.3.1 255.255.255.248
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > ip router isis
> > > !
> > > router isis
> > > net 05.0000.0000.0001.00
> > >
> > > hostname r3
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0
> > > ip address 10.0.3.3 255.255.255.248
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > ip router isis
> > > !
> > > router isis
> > > net 05.0000.0000.0003.00
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:00 GMT-3