From: Simon Baxter (Simon.Baxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 03:22:00 GMT-3
Yes, a very good reason.
I've heard during the 'break-fix' phase if a FR 'cloud' has been provided a
fault can get induced where Cisco will advertise the same ip address on 2
different DLCIs - giving an intermittant dual-path fault.
If you tie the layer 3 to the DLCI you want, you'll not be relying on
inverse-arp to tie the two together.
nasty.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott F. Robohn [mailto:sfr@mentortech.com]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 1:48 PM
To: Dave Genton; ccielab groupstudy
Subject: Re: is the following true?
Yes, you *can* relay on inverse-arp in a full-mesh network.
But is there any compelling reason to, especially in the
lab?
sfr
Dave Genton wrote:
>
> Only if you have a full mesh environment, then you can rely on inverse
arp.
>
> DAve
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott F. Robohn" <sfr@mentortech.com>
> To: "Scott Morris" <smorris@mentortech.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 8:06 PM
> Subject: Re: is the following true?
>
> > 'frame-relay map' statements seem to be a pretty good idea
> > no matter what on multipoint subinterfaces.
> >
> > Is there any good reason to *not* use 'frame-relay map ...'
> > on multipoint subints, other than being explicitly told not
> > to?
> >
> > sfr
> > RTP 8/14-15
> >
> > Scott Morris wrote:
> > >
> > > No, it's not true.
> > >
> > > Or, I should say, if you don't do anything out of the ordinary, it
won't
> > > work...
> > >
> > > But like any protocol on a multipoint interface, if you "frame-relay
map
> > > clns ...." then you can point your nsap addresses to dlci's and it'll
> work
> > > just fine then.
> > >
> > > Scott Morris, MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDP (R&S), CCIE (R&S) #4713, Security
> > > Specialization, CCNA - WAN Switching
> > > CCSI #21903
> > > smorris@ccci.com
> >
> >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > > ------------------------------
> > > Mentor Technologies Group, Inc. http://www.mentortech.com
> > > Formerly Chesapeake Network Solutions http://www.ccci.com
> > > Cell Phone: 941-350-8590
e-mail:smorris@mentortech.com
> > > Pager: 800-490-1326 Fax: 606-225-8403
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Timur.Mirza@Notes.airtouch.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 9:06 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: is the following true?
> > >
> > > you cannot establish clns is-neighbor adjacencies over point to
> multipoint
> > > networks (they must be pt2pt)
> > >
> > > i had heard an instructor say this in a practice lab session & it
sounds
> > > like
> > > its true bec/ i cannot establish an adjacency across a frame relay
> > > multipoint
> > > connection...timur
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:59 GMT-3