From: Feliz, Edgar (Edgar.Feliz@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 00:55:16 GMT-3
D.J.
I can not tell you why yet I have to do some digging around. But I can tell
you that I tried it while in the Caslow class last week, and it did not
work. I asked Bruce, and he said no that you could not have them both on. I
did not ask him to go into it further because I did not want to hold the
class back. When I find out why I will let you know.
EF
-----Original Message-----
From: D. J. Jones [mailto:meganac@home.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 6:25 PM
To: Feliz, Edgar; Ryan Hoffman; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ISIS inarp issue...
Could you please explain why not? thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Feliz, Edgar" <Edgar.Feliz@BTNA.com>
To: "Ryan Hoffman" <ryan.hoffman@telus.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 7:07 AM
Subject: RE: ISIS inarp issue...
> You can not have both CLNS, and ISIS configured on an interface at the
same
> time.
>
> EF
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Hoffman [mailto:ryan.hoffman@telus.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 9:49 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: ISIS inarp issue...
>
>
> Caslow pg 111 indicates fr inarp for iso clns is supported. I can't get
the
> following to bring up dynamic map entries. Is it supported for osi clns
> routing only, not isis?
>
>
> hostname r1
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.0.3.1 255.255.255.248
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip router isis
> !
> router isis
> net 05.0000.0000.0001.00
>
> hostname r3
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.0.3.3 255.255.255.248
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip router isis
> !
> router isis
> net 05.0000.0000.0003.00
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:59 GMT-3