From: Scott F. Robohn (sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 31 2000 - 00:06:59 GMT-3
'frame-relay map' statements seem to be a pretty good idea
no matter what on multipoint subinterfaces.
Is there any good reason to *not* use 'frame-relay map ...'
on multipoint subints, other than being explicitly told not
to?
sfr
RTP 8/14-15
Scott Morris wrote:
>
> No, it's not true.
>
> Or, I should say, if you don't do anything out of the ordinary, it won't
> work...
>
> But like any protocol on a multipoint interface, if you "frame-relay map
> clns ...." then you can point your nsap addresses to dlci's and it'll work
> just fine then.
>
> Scott Morris, MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDP (R&S), CCIE (R&S) #4713, Security
> Specialization, CCNA - WAN Switching
> CCSI #21903
> smorris@ccci.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> Mentor Technologies Group, Inc. http://www.mentortech.com
> Formerly Chesapeake Network Solutions http://www.ccci.com
> Cell Phone: 941-350-8590 e-mail:smorris@mentortech.com
> Pager: 800-490-1326 Fax: 606-225-8403
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Timur.Mirza@Notes.airtouch.com
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 9:06 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: is the following true?
>
> you cannot establish clns is-neighbor adjacencies over point to multipoint
> networks (they must be pt2pt)
>
> i had heard an instructor say this in a practice lab session & it sounds
> like
> its true bec/ i cannot establish an adjacency across a frame relay
> multipoint
> connection...timur
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:59 GMT-3