Re: Policy routes

From: Lachlan_Kidd@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun Jul 23 2000 - 22:36:25 GMT-3

• Next message: Brian Hescock: "Re: Policy routes"
• Previous message: Crouch, Keith: "RE: Policy routes"
• Maybe in reply to: Aaron DuShey: "Policy routes"
• Next in thread: Brian Hescock: "Re: Policy routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

As far as I know, policy routing is done first before any route table
lookups are done. Hence the need to place the policy inbound on the
incoming interface so the packet will be policy routed rather than via the
route table. If there is no match on the policy, then normal routing is
used.
Lachlan

                    "Aaron

                    DuShey" To: "CCIE \(E-mail\)" <ccielab@gro
upstudy.com>
                    <adushey@yaho cc:

                    o.com> Subject: Policy routes

                    Sent by:

                    nobody@groups

                    tudy.com

                    24/07/00

                    03:59 AM

                    Please

                    respond to

                    "Aaron

                    DuShey"

What priority(admin distance) do Policy routes have over other routes, such
as Direct connects, OSPF, EIGRP etc..?
I have a problem which I cannot ping a local loopback interface after
configuring a policy route. Any suggestions?
thanks,

Aaron DuShey

• Next message: Brian Hescock: "Re: Policy routes"
• Previous message: Crouch, Keith: "RE: Policy routes"
• Maybe in reply to: Aaron DuShey: "Policy routes"
• Next in thread: Brian Hescock: "Re: Policy routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:57 GMT-3