From: Sawal, Vijay (Vijay.Sawal@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 21 2000 - 21:32:28 GMT-3
-----Original Message-----
From: Sawal, Vijay
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 8:31 PM
To: 'Rick Burts'
Subject: RE: EIGRP over ISDN
Rick,
if this is correct the things should work. Have u tried this scenario
practically?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Burts [mailto:burts@mentortech.com]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 8:20 PM
To: Walid Fahme
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: EIGRP over ISDN
uninteresting packets certainly do not reset the idle timer. EIGRP hello
will not keep the line up in this configuration.
Rick
On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Walid Fahme wrote:
> Thanks Rick. I think you have a point. The Hello packets should establish
> neighbor relation once the link comes up again. But don't you think the
> hello packets will keep the link up ? Or uninteresting packets will not
> clear the idle timer ??????
>
> Ciao,
> Walid.
>
>
> Look more carefully at his example. His access list did not discard
> Hello packets, it merely made them uninteresting. If the link is
> down, Hello will not bring it up. If the link is up, hello will be
> exchanged and neighbor relationship will form and routes will be
> advertised.
>
> Rick
>
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Bill Dicks wrote:
>
> > If you filter the Hellos, then how will the two routers become neighbors
> > unless the line is already up? If they don't become neighbors, how will
> > routing occur and routes be exchanged?
> >
> > I see you have the floating static, so if your link to the WAN goes
down,
> > this will be the only route. BUT, since you are filtering eigrp, you
will
> > never become neighbors with the other router on the other side of the
ISDN
> > link and no routes will be exchanged. If you're going to use a floating
> > static, use 0.0.0.0 so that all traffic goes that way (assuming of
course
> > that you have a normal 0.0.0.0 route when the WAN link is up). But
without
> > Hellos, no neighbor and no routes.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf Of
> > Wojtek Iwanczyk
> > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 1:08 PM
> > To: aub95@emirates.net.ae; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: EIGRP over ISDN
> >
> > Here is a sample config of DDR using EIGRP ... Filter eigrp "helo s"
with
> > the dialer list referencing an extended ip access list ...
> >
> >
> > interface Dialer0
> > description ISDN Dial-up to NY-PRI-BRI-Router
> > ip unnumbered Loopback0
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > ip nat outside
> > encapsulation ppp
> > bandwidth 2
> > delay 6000
> > dialer remote-name Router1
> > dialer idle-timeout 90
> > dialer string xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > dialer string xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > dialer pool 1
> > dialer-group 1
> > pulse-time 0
> > ppp authentication chap callin
> > ppp chap hostname xxxxx
> > ppp chap password xxxxx
> >
> > router eigrp 1
> > network 172.31.0.0
> > no auto-summary
> >
> > ip route 172.31.0.0 255.255.0.0 Dialer0 240
> >
> >
> > access-list 160 deny udp any any eq snmp
> > access-list 160 deny eigrp any any
> > access-list 160 permit ip any any
> >
> > dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 160
> >
> > Wojtek Iwanczyk
> > Sr Support Engineer
> > Exenet Technologies
> > 15 E 26th Street
> > New York, NY 10010
> > (212) 684 7300
> > wiwanczyk@exenet.com
> >
> >
> > >>> Walid Fahme <aub95@emirates.net.ae> 07/21/00 01:14PM >>>
> > Question:
> >
> > To limit Distance Vector Protocol updates on a dialup link (ISDN) we
> > have several options (Snapshot, Watch-Group)
> >
> > To limit Link State OSPF updates ==> "ip ospf demand"
> >
> > What about EIGRP, any solution ???
> >
> > (Also, is there anything for IS-IS, NLSP and others ????)
> >
> > Appreciate your comments.
> >
> > Walid Fahme.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:56 GMT-3