From: Vijay Venkatesh (vijay.venkatesh@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 17 2000 - 00:50:59 GMT-3
Use the area x range x.x.x.x command
Vijay.
Philip Lai wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I don't think you can summarize the ospf routes if they are in the same
> area. Summary-address only apply to external route.
>
> In this case, the ip default-network does not work since all networks are
> 168.10.X.X. The ip route 0.0.0.0/0 to null 0 in RB also does not work
> since IGRP need a distinct network number to be the default.
>
> I think you have to use static route in Rb.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Thanks
> Philip Lai
>
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Chia Kim Seng, Sr Network Spec, SCS-Networks wrote:
>
> > You can do a summarization on RA using summary-address command to summary
> > all the 28 bits and and 30 bits routes to 26 bits route. Then redistribute
> > to IGRP.
> > Use keyword, 'not-advertise' with summary-address command to suppress this
> > route from being advertised into the OSPF domain as type-7.
> >
> > e.g summary-address x.x.x.x m.m.m.m not-advertise
> >
> > try it, let me know if this works?
> >
> > May all being be happy!
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tok cok [mailto:tokcok@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 2:30 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Redistributing FLSM to VLSM
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was trying out some redistributing lab exericse on Classless to Classful.
> >
> > But encounter some problem in solving the VLSM and FLSM issue.
> >
> > ---(e0)RA(s0)-------(S1)RB(s0)---(s0)RC(e0)---
> >
> > RA's e0 is running RIP 10.1.1.1/24
> > RA's s0 is running IGRP 168.10.1.66/26
> > RB's s1 is running IGRP 168.10.1.65/26
> > RB's s0 is running OSPF 168.10.1.33/28
> > RC's s0 is running OSPF 168.10.1.34/28
> > RC's e0 is running OSPF 168.10.1.17/30
> >
> > I'm trying to do a mutual redistribution between OSPF and IGRP, so that RA
> > will knows how to reach OSPF networks and RB know the IGRP network.
> >
> > I went through Caslow's book. He said either use summarization or annouce
> > an IP default-network on the redistributing router into the IGRP domain
> > (which I think should be RB in this case)
> >
> > I've try using ip default-network, but confuse on how to do it. I try
> > specified ip default-network 168.10.0.0 on RB, but it doesn't get advertise
d
> >
> > to RA IGRP domain.
> >
> > I've try using a default route at RA, ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 168.10.1.65.
> >
> > But the default route gets advertised to the RIP domain, which I do not wan
t
> >
> > that.
> >
> > Can anyone enlighten me on how to solve this Redistributing between VLSM an
d
> >
> > FLSM issues?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!!!
> > tok
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:54 GMT-3