From: William Darkwah (william.darkwah@xxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jun 30 2000 - 16:55:36 GMT-3
Vijay,
You are suppose to get that error message since you did not set the
next hop in your route-map statement.
All that the message is telling you is that it is using the normal ip
routing table to route the packets. The precedence is already
been set.
By the way you need to enable fair queue if you want to set ip precedence
for the interfaces to abide by the rule.
William
----- Original Message -----
From: Vijaykrishna <vijaykrishna@netzero.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 2:57 PM
Subject: Policy routing
> I am trying to set precedence for the IP packet using policy routing.
> here is the setup and config.
>
> ----R1-e0---------192.168.1.32/30----------e2/0-R2------192.168.1.4/30----
-R
> 3
>
>
> R2-config:
> access-list 10 permit 192.168.1.34
> route-map polrtg permit 10
> match ip address 10
> set ip precedence immediate
> !
> interface Ethernet2/0
> ip address 192.168.1.33 255.255.255.224
> ip policy route-map polrtg
>
> The purpose is to set ip precedance 2 on R2 for the traffic coming from
R1.
>
> when I do debug ip policy on R2 and send traffic from R1 to R3, I get
> following mesg.
> *Jun 30 18:24:43: IP: route map polrtg, item 10, permit
> *Jun 30 18:24:43: IP: s=192.168.1.34 (Ethernet2/0), d=192.168.1.6
> (ATM1/0/0.1),
> len 40, policy rejected -- normal forwarding
>
> SO it looks like rejecting the policy. Has anyone tried this... ??
> Am I missing something ??
>
> thanks,
> vijay
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:44 GMT-3