From: Kruepke (lister@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 25 2000 - 23:47:17 GMT-3
You would not need a routing protocol at all. If a router has two interfaces w
ith IP addresses configured, it will route between those networks, even if no r
outing protocol is configured. (The only exception is when 'no ip routing' has
been configured.) Or even static routes can be used without routing protocols
.
I also don't think you would need 'ip classless' on in this case. That would a
ffect the use of a default route, which is not being used in this case anyway.
I do agree that it is important that the workstations have their default gatewa
ys configured correctly.
Keith
----- Original Message -----
From: "David H. Brown" <DHBrown@Pipeline.com>
To: <sliu@ttank.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 9:22 PM
Subject: RE: Challenge Question
If there was a routing protocol on the router that supports classless
routing, and IP Classless is on, and BOTH workstations have the default G/W
set to the proper interface on the router, then it would route.
David
(RTP Lab 9/28)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
sliu@ttank.com
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 6:33 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: cisco@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: Challenge Question
Here it goes:
On an ethernet LAN segment, there are PC1, PC2, and Router.
PC1 is configured with IP address: 10.1.1.1/24
PC2 is configured with IP address: 10.1.2.2/24
Router's ethernet interface is configured with 2 IP addresses with
both subnets: 10.1.1.3/24 and 10.1.2.3/24,
Now, what if PC1 pings PC2, would it go through and why?
- Sean
CCNP, and others
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:43 GMT-3