From: Lekan Magbagbeola (lekkyl@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 14 2000 - 21:53:42 GMT-3
xuping,
>I find when a route learned by both iBGP and OSPF external (O E1 or O E2),
>it donot think it is syncronized and therefore not advise to EBGP peer, Is
>it normal or a bug?
Lekan> Well that's the normal operation for BGP according
to BGP rule. An IBGP router will not send
unsynchronized route to its EBGP peer unless it's
synchronized with the IGP running withing the AS.
What you can do to bypass that it to disable
syncronisation by using "no synch", but this has a
side effect of packets being dropped.
I stand to be corrected, but I think that's the way it's designed to work.
Lekan
>From: "xuping" <cnmiecxu@public.bta.net.cn>
>Reply-To: "xuping" <cnmiecxu@public.bta.net.cn>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: BGP sync
>Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 22:22:01 +0800
>
>Hi groups
>
>I find when a route learned by both iBGP and OSPF external (O E1 or O E2),
>it donot think it is syncronized and therefore not advise to EBGP peer, Is
>it normal or a bug?
>
>I try on 12.0.11 and 11.2.21, and do "clear ip bgp *", "clear ip ospf
>process", but no luck, why?
>
>TIA
>xuping
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:42 GMT-3