From: William Darkwah (william.darkwah@xxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 14 2000 - 17:10:44 GMT-3
1. you will need ebgp-multi-hop command if you want to use loopback on two
different confederations peers. I tried it and it worked.
2. Yes, I believe so
3. No, You do not need the conferderations peer commands on neighbors who do
no border other peers.
william
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Needham <mineedha@cisco.com>
To: <CCIELAB@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 4:48 PM
Subject: BGP CONFEDERATIONS Question
> In a confederation can I still use update-source between two different
> portions of the confederated network. Ie between 5555 to 4444 neigbors
> with a confed of 6?
>
> If I continue to use a loopback as a neighbor address do I need EBGP
> multihop between to two AS's within the confed. to permit connectivity?
>
>
> Does the next-hop commands still relative within the confed?
>
> Finally, if a router is part of a confederation and has no other
> connections other to a member of it's "native" conferedation, do you
> still need the confederation peer ID command???
>
>
> I'm doing a rather complex LAb (self invented) and having issues with
> such... Thanks
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:42 GMT-3