From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 13:17:47 GMT-3
It was found in 11.2(18) and 12.0(5) (mainline images for both). The bug
was fixed in 12.0(8.2)T and 12.0(8.2)P1, meaning it's fixed in
12.1(1). 12.1(1) incorporates all of the 12.0(x)T code. I'm not sure
about the 12.0(8.2)P1, I didn't think we had a P train in 12.0, I thought
it's only 11.2. It could be a typo.
Brian
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Kruepke wrote:
> Do you know what IOS(es) this affects? Or is it all? I know I've seen that
mask work in some situations, but the use of "may not be" makes me nervous...
>
> Thanks.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin M. Woods" <kev@nil.org>
> To: "chinawy" <chinawy@etang.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 1:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Route redistribution problem
>
>
> This is a bug (CSCdm75819). The description states:
>
> If OSPF is configured using a "network x.x.x.x 0.0.0.0 area x"
> command (explicitly identifying and interface), then the connected
> interface information may not be properly redistributed into other
> protocols (configured to "redistribute ospf xxx...").
> Workaround: use a general mask instead ("network x.x.x.0 0.0.0.255
> area x", for example).
>
> Kevin
>
> // hi,all:
> //
> // I have a quession about route redis following :
> //
> // e0 e0 s0 s0
> // r1---------------r2---------------r3
> // ospf100 eigrp 100
> //
> //
> // r1:
> //
> // int e0
> // ip add 137.20.20.1 255.255.255.0
> //
> // router ospf
> // netw 137.20.20.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
> //
> //
> // r2:
> //
> // int e0
> // ip add 137.20.20.2 255.255.255.0
> // int s0
> // ip add 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> //
> // router eigrp 100
> // netw 192.168.1.1
> // redis ospf 100 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
> //
> // router ospf 100
> // netw 137.20.20.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> //
> //
> // r3:
> // int s0
> // ip add 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
> //
> // router eigrp 100
> // netw 192.168.1.0
> //
> // apply this config on router,i haven't seen 137.20.20.0 in r3 route table.
> // i change my config in r2:
> // r2:
> //
> // int e0
> // ip add 137.20.20.2 255.255.255.0
> // int s0
> // ip add 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> //
> // router eigrp 100
> // netw 192.168.1.1
> // redis ospf 100 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
> //
> // router ospf 100
> // netw 137.20.20.2 0.0.0.255 area 0 file://changed//
> //
> // After changed,i can see this route about 137.20.20.0 in r3 route table,i f
eel puzzle, sb will give me idea about it?
> //
> //
> //
> //
> //
> //
> //
> // --------------------------
> // Paul Wang (CCIE Candidate)
> // E-Mail:chinawy@etang.com
> // --------------------------
> // 赶快参加CNNIC有奖调查，亿唐需要您的支持。
> // http://fsurvey.cnnic.net.cn/survey/index.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:41 GMT-3