From: Tony Jackson (tjackso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 27 2000 - 20:57:23 GMT-3
The NSSA solution should work. The ASBR will distribute type 7 LSAs
The ABR will translate these type 7 LSAs into type 5 LSA across the backbone
area. The stub area will still retain it's stub area characteristics.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Earl Aboytes
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 7:07 PM
To: 'Earl Aboytes'; Maljure, Sanjay
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: OSPF and default route
This seems to be a common theme amongst all of the respones that I received.
It makes sense and probably works. I saw it in a lab scenario some time ago
and I do not currently have it configured in the lab. I will have to try it
some other time.
Earl
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Maljure, Sanjay" <smaljure@cibernetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 13:41:30 -0600
>Do u think making area 1 NSSA is a valid option?
>This will allow u to inject a default route but still get external routes
>from any ASBRs in area 1
>Sanjay
>
>
>All,
>I have an ospf area (area 1) touching area 0 that has a default route
>injected into it by the ABR. My problem is that I am required to send a
>default route into area 1 without sending it into other areas. How do I
>accomplish this? I thought about making area 1 a stub area but I would
lose
>my external routes coming from through the core. Maybe that's ok. Can
>anyone shed some light on this?
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Earl Aboytes
>Senior Technical Consultant
>GTE-Managed Solutions
>800-483-5325 x8817
>earl.aboytes@telops.gte.com
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:32 GMT-3