From: Eugene Nesterenko (eenest@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 22 2000 - 17:38:09 GMT-3
Hi All!
I got my CCIE in Brussels last November and we had only 2 hours
to do all the stuff. And the timing was STRICT.
Wasn't easy, yeah :-)
Regards,
Eugene
------------------------------
Eugene Nesterenko, CCIE #5283, CCNP+Security, CCDP, MCSE
Fax/VoiceMail: +1 (415) 7043497
>From: "Mosley, Arthur" <Arthur.Mosley@wang.com>
>Reply-To: "Mosley, Arthur" <Arthur.Mosley@wang.com>
>To: 'LASSERRE Grégory' <gregory.lasserre@arche.fr>,
>"'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>CC: "'Vijaykrishna'" <vijaykrishna@netzero.net>, "Mosley, Arthur"
><Arthur.Mosley@wang.com>
>Subject: RE: CCIE LAB - Changes in the LAB Pattern
>Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:48:40 -0400
>
>I successfully took the exam two months ago in Halifax and remember having
>the full three hours. I passed on my first attempt and I wondered how
>difficult the new format is in comparison to the old format.
>
>Art
>
>Call me crazy...but I thing about pursuing the WAN switching CCIE. I need
>to get a life! I still don't see the benefit yet....
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: LASSERRE Grégory [mailto:gregory.lasserre@arche.fr]
>Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 1:43 PM
>To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Cc: 'Vijaykrishna'; 'Mosley, Arthur'
>Subject: RE: CCIE LAB - Changes in the LAB Pattern
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>I dont' want to break any NDA rule,
>but i passed the CCIE Lab recently in Bruxelles and :
>
>we had to troubleshoot brand new confs especially prepared for this
>purpose.
>we got 2 Hours only for this part.... no extra time.
>
>I've heard from the proctor this would definitely be the NEW Standarized
>Lab
>pattern.
>
>Cheers.
>Greg.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:30 GMT-3