From: Muthu Mohanasundaram (mmsundar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 17:38:30 GMT-3
Arthur,
What archives are you talking about?
The archives of this mailing list?
Mohan.
--- "Mosley, Arthur" <Arthur.Mosley@wang.com> wrote:
>
> Cisco is standardizing the troubleshooting lab.
> You no longer troubleshoot
> your own lab. You download the configs and review
> scenario, recable and fix
> the problems. This change has already been made in
> Halifax.
>
> I believe this makes the whole process more
> challenging. It took me a
> few minutes to get acquainted with the
> troubleshooting lab. You have the
> same issues in this new format. However, I had
> several tech areas that
> was on my troubleshooting lab that was not on the
> lab I had been
> working on for a day and a half.
>
> It is definitely not a given you will pass if you
> get into
> troubleshooting. You want to go into troubleshooting
> with a strong
> score.
>
>
> Art
> Other issue: I recommend that people review the
> archive on a given
> topic. There's a gold mine of information out
> there.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nagaraja Byndoor
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: 5/21/00 1:44 PM
> Subject: CCIE LAB - Changes in the LAB Pattern
>
> Hello,
>
> I think couple of days some one in this study group
> mention that the LAB
> pattern has been changed like
>
> On the day 1 there will be two different paper one
> for the 1 st half and
> one
> for the second half, is it True ?
>
> Regarding troubleshooting the candidates should
> troubleshoot the network
> setup created by the others , is it true ?
>
> And the last one can any one have good doc's(URL) on
> how to configure
> the XL
> series switch and the Token ring switch ?
>
> THanks in Advance,
>
> Regards
>
> Raj
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:30 GMT-3