From: Joe Martin (jmartin@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 14:53:19 GMT-3
Thats a Typo, it should be the ASBR.
JOE
----- Original Message -----
From: John Conzone
To: ccielab
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2000 9:06 AM
Subject: Caslow page 397 OSPF summary-address statement mis-print?
The top of the page says that you would apply the summary-address
statement for summarizing RIP routes into OSPF on the ABR. Is this a
mis-print or correct? I would think it would go on the ASBR.
Also, LSA Type 5's cannot be summarized once in an OSPF AS, so is
this taking place before the ASBR sources a Type 5? Yes, I'm confused
once more.
Thanks!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:30 GMT-3