From: wyan@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun May 07 2000 - 02:17:05 GMT-3
Have any one really tried it? I tried this case study in my lab and I
couldn't
make R1 talk to R3 without making R2 as a border node.
Weidong
---------------------- Forwarded by Weidong Yan/Markham/IBM on 05/07/2000
01:14 AM ---------------------------
"Nnanna Obuba" <obuba@bellatlantic.net> on 05/05/2000 06:01:45 PM
Please respond to "Nnanna Obuba" <obuba@bellatlantic.net>
To: "Asbjorn Hojmark" <Asbjorn@Hojmark.ORG>, "'Li Chaoyong'"
<hughcyli@holybridge.com.cn>
cc: "'GROUPSTUDY CCIELAB'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: An DLSW PROBLEM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Asbjorn Hojmark" <Asbjorn@Hojmark.ORG>
To: "'Li Chaoyong'" <hughcyli@holybridge.com.cn>
Cc: "'GROUPSTUDY CCIELAB'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 5:32 PM
Subject: RE: An DLSW PROBLEM
>
> > R1-------------R2---------------R3
> >
> > R1 have dlsw peer with R2. R2 have dlsw peer with R3. R1 have
> > not dlsw peer with R3. R1 still can communication with R3. How
> > to do?
> >
> > Border peers are not allow to use.
>
> Border peers aren't necessary for this. If you set it up in the
> lab, you'll see that it works with only two peers. DLSw doesn't
> need to be fully meshed (as does RSRB, IIRC).
>
> HTH,
> -A
> --
> Heroes: Vint Cerf & Bob Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Robert Metcalfe
> Links : http://www.hojmark.org/networking/
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:27 GMT-3