From: Joe Martin (jmartin@xxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 19 2000 - 23:20:44 GMT-3
In a mini-class I took at Interop a couple of years ago with Fore Systems,
we did some testing of voice/video and data across a LANE network with and
without MPOA. A clear example of its benefit was that a file transfer that
took 61 seconds without MPOA took 5 seconds with it turned on.
JOE
----- Original Message -----
From: <Ron.Fuller@3x.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 3:42 PM
Subject: IS-IS and OSPF weirdness
> I am having a situation where I cannot get directly connected IS-IS
> networks redistributed into OSPF properly. They don't show up in the OSPF
> database at all. I tried doing a redistribute connected under both router
> isis and router ospf to no avail. Is this "normal" behavior for IS-IS?
> Finding very good docs on this protocol is few and far between.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> BTW: I never did get my LS1010 switch to advertise the LECS via ILMI, but
> still was able to get LANE to work. Many thanks to the people that
> responded. I learned a lot about LANE yesterday!
>
> Here's another question.....why would I want to use MPOA vs. LANE? It
> looks like MPOA requires LANE to work, so why bother? Maybe this is
> obvoius, but I really haven't dug into MPOA yet.
>
> Ron Fuller, CCDP, CCNP-ATM, CCNP-Security, MCNE, MCP
> 3X Corporation
> rfuller@3x.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:14 GMT-3