From: Ryan B (rbenigno@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:36:56 GMT-3
Nope, it's a standard netmask... Not like the network statement.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Hennigan" <jay@west.net>
To: "Stanley Seow" <stanley_seow@techno-craft.com.sg>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: OSPF into IGRP
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Stanley Seow wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the late replies, I was too busy to try out the solution
given...
> >
> > I found the solution using the followings :
> >
> > router1
> > router ospf 100
> > area 2 range 170.100.2.0 255.255.255.0
> >
> > ( 170.100.2.0 is actually /30 )
>
> Shouldn't this be a wildcard and not a standard netmask? As in:
>
> area 2 range 170.100.2.0 0.0.0.255 (or 0.0.0.3)
>
> > router2
> > roter ospf 100
> > area 1 range 170.100.1.0 255.255.255.0
> >
> > ( 170.100.1.0 is actually /32 (lookback address )
> >
> > I summarize those non /24 routes into a /24 bit so that all the other
OSPF
> > area get a standard /24 area and gets redistributed into IGRP...
>
> You probably don't want to use an address ending in .0 as a loopback if
> you're redistributing as a /24.
>
> --
> Jay Hennigan - Network Administration - jay@west.net
> NetLojix Communications, Inc. NASDAQ: NETX - http://www.netlojix.com/
> WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:13 GMT-3