From: Michael Bausenwein (mikeb55@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 03 2000 - 21:57:41 GMT-3
some advice on addressing:
break up your addressing logically. I usually give each router a block of
16 /24's. This will allow you to easily assign addresses that can be
summarized. One way to do this is to create a "timeline" as my instructor
called it.
172.16.0.0
172.16.255.0
R1 R2 R3 R4
R5
1 15|16 31|32 47|48
63| 64
Draw in the boundries.
Another hint is to do a diagram, and list all interfaces and addresses.
This will save you time when you are told to setup a bgp relationship
between R1 and R2. If you have things well documented to begin with you'll
get done faster with less mistakes.
Just my 2 Cents
Mike
30 days till halifax.........
----- Original Message -----
From: Rahmlow, Howard F. <howard.rahmlow@unisys.com>
To: 'Scott Morris' <smorris@ccci.com>; 'Clifton L. Stewart'
<cliftonlstewart@home.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: IP Addressing Scheme
> I agree with scott, make sure you read the whole test, twice before
setting
> up the address. I got nailed on the last test, by not reading, then had to
> change a bunch of addresses, not fun. After that, your on your own. You
may
> have to set loopbacks, on some routers, and they may give you the address,
> and also be told you have to be able to ping all addresses. Check with the
> proctor on how he/she wants the loop backs handled.
>
> Howard
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Morris [mailto:smorris@ccci.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 11:19 AM
> To: 'Clifton L. Stewart'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IP Addressing Scheme
>
>
> Nope, there's no command that allows vlsm designations to be used instead
of
> "regular" netmasks. That would take all the fun out of things, now
wouldn't
> it? :) One of the things you're being tested on is mathematical
abilities.
>
> As for the addressing, I'd say it all depends on which way you tend to
> think. If you think one direction, and it works, don't force yourself to
> change that. The test doesn't specify anything like that, and doesn't
care.
> Make sure you READ everything first to make sure addresses aren't
specified
> anyplace. Other than that, address at your leisure.
>
> Results, not process....
>
> Scott Morris, MCSE, CNE(3.x), CCDP (R&S), CCIE (R&S) #4713, Security
> Specialization, CCNA - WAN Switching
> smorris@ccci.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- > ------------------------------ > Chesapeake Network Solutions http://www.ccci.com > Cell Phone: 941-350-8590 e-mail:smorris@ccci.com > Pager: 800-490-1326 Fax: 606-225-8403 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of > Clifton L. Stewart > Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 9:52 AM > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: IP Addressing Scheme > > > When doing the addressing for a lab do most people start with the nodes > that will have the most hosts? I am trying to time myself with this > process and wanted to know what the average time is. It usually takes a > hour or maybe a hour and half tops. Thanks for sharing your tips. > > Clifton Stewart-CCNA, CCIE Candidate > > P.S. Also there is a command that will allow me to specify /26 opposed > to .192 does anyone know what it is? I been seaching through the IOS > docs but can't seem to locate it. I think I could save 10 minutes with > the command.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:12 GMT-3