Are LSAP access lists always paired?

From: Ben_J_Durand@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Mar 27 2000 - 10:58:04 GMT-3

• Next message: Aaron DuShey: "Netbios and IPX addressing and summarization"
• Previous message: Joel W. Ekis: "Re: Suppressing a BGP aggregate within IBGP"
• Next in thread: David Russell: "Re: Are LSAP access lists always paired?"
• Maybe reply: David Russell: "Re: Are LSAP access lists always paired?"
• Maybe reply: clou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Are LSAP access lists always paired?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi guys,

Last question before the big day: Are the LSAP entries in 200 series
access-lists always come in pair?

What I mean is, if they ask you to block Netbios, is it always goign to be
0xF0F0 or can it be 0xF0?? where ?? is something else? Also same for SNA. It
covers 04, 08 and 0C. Can a communication go 0x0408 for example? or is it
always 0x0404, 0x0808?

What's the best way of blocking all this traffic? would 0x00F0, 0x0004, 0x0008
,
0x000C with mask 0xFF00 be better?

Thanks in advance for your input.

- Ben

Counting hours now.

• Next message: Aaron DuShey: "Netbios and IPX addressing and summarization"
• Previous message: Joel W. Ekis: "Re: Suppressing a BGP aggregate within IBGP"
• Next in thread: David Russell: "Re: Are LSAP access lists always paired?"
• Maybe reply: David Russell: "Re: Are LSAP access lists always paired?"
• Maybe reply: clou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Are LSAP access lists always paired?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:07 GMT-3