From: Dave Gahm (gahm@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 25 2000 - 14:03:37 GMT-3
Chi,
Your example provides the answer to your question. You have PVCs to 2
routers, each of which can inverse-arp to learn 131.108.168.1, but for 168.2
and168.3 to learn about each other will require map-lists on those routers.
Or to put it another way, mapping is required on spoke legs in a partial
mesh configuration.
Regards, Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: clou@ebnetworks.com <clou@ebnetworks.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Saturday, March 25, 2000 6:58 AM
Subject: A quick one
>Thanks for the responses/suggestion of my last ATM question,
>You guys are good. Here's a quick question,
>
>If Inverse ARP can be used, why would you use MAP-LIST?
>for example,
>
>*** INARP
>interface atm 0
> ip address 131.108.168.1 255.255.255.0
> atm rate-queue 1 100
> atm pvc 1 0 10 aal5snap inarp
> atm pvc 2 0 20 aal5snap inarp
>
>*** map-list
>interface atm 0
> ip address 131.108.168.1 255.255.255.0
> atm rate-queue 1 100
> atm pvc 1 0 10 aal5snap
> atm pvc 2 0 20 aal5snap
> map-group test-a
>!
>map-list test-a
> ip 131.108.168.2 atm-vc 1 broadcast
> ip 131.108.168.3 atm-vc 2 broadcast
>
>Thanks,
>
>Chi
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:06 GMT-3