From: Denton Bobeldyk (denny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 16:22:01 GMT-3
You might have to put 'priority-group 1' underneath the physical interface on
both routers to get it to work properly.
-Denny
Greg Schwimer wrote:
> Dave,
>
> How about if I am doing multiprotocol over frame, i.e. IPX and appletalk,
> etc. Does this look like it would work? Are there any specific routing
> issues I might have to address? I have set up the lists to give www and
> telnet "high" priority and map through DLCI 140, IPX as "medium" and map
> through 141, etc...
>
> Int S1.140 multipoint
> ip addr 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 140 141 142 143
> frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 140 broadcast
> frame-relay map ipx 1014.2 140
> frame-relay map appletalk 1014.2 140
>
> router ospf 100
> network 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
>
> priority-list 1 default low
> priority-list 1 protocol tcp telnet high
> priority-list 1 protocol tcp www high
> priority-list 1 protocol ipx medium
> priority-list 1 protocol appletalk low
> priority-list 1 protocol tcp ftp normal
> priority-list 1 protocol tcp ftp-data normal
>
> Thanks!
> Greg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> David Russell
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2000 7:15 PM
> To: Greg Schwimer; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Frame relay DLCI Prioritization
>
> Greg,
>
> Only the high priority DLCI needs to be mapped. So try dropping all of the
> secondary addresses and associated maps.
>
> Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Schwimer <schwim@speedchoice.com>
> To: CCIE Lab Study Group (E-mail) <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Date: Friday, March 17, 2000 10:47 PM
> Subject: Frame relay DLCI Prioritization
>
> >I ran into a problem I just could not completely solve regarding frame
> relay
> >DLCI prioritization. The scenario has two routers connected via 4 PVCs
> >through a frame cloud. I was trying to get the DLCI prioritization to
> work.
> >IOS was 11.2(16) (I know...). Its not that routing was not taking place,
> it
> >was that it was not being prioritized AT ALL. Debug priority showed all
> >packets going through as "normal" priority.
> >
> >Below is the router 1 config. Router 2 config is exactly the same with the
> >exception of the obvious IP address changes and DLCI numbers. Any ideas
> >would be greatly appreciated!
> >Greg
> >
> >Router 1
> >
> >Int S1.140 multipoint
> > ip addr 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > ip addr 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0 secondary
> > ip addr 172.16.1.5 255.255.255.0 secondary
> > ip addr 172.16.1.7 255.255.255.0 secondary
> > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 140 141 142 143
> > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 140 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.4 141 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.6 142 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.8 143 broadcast
> >
> >router ospf 100
> > network 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
> >
> >priority-list 1 default low
> >priority-list 1 protocol tcp telnet high
> >priority-list 1 protocol tcp www medium
> >priority-list 1 protocol tcp ftp normal
> >priority-list 1 protocol tcp ftp-data normal
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:06 GMT-3