From: carl commander (carl_commander@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 20 2000 - 11:54:03 GMT-3
I agree with Jim you should never count out anything with cisco. Especially
ATM as it is an emerging topic...
>From: Jim Ervin <eminopapa@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Jim Ervin <eminopapa@yahoo.com>
>To: "Mosley, Arthur" <Arthur.Mosley@wang.com>, "'Rich Parsons '"
><richard_parsons@ins.com>, "'ccielab@groupstudy.com '"
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: ATM
>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 02:24:38 -0800 (PST)
>
>I'd look at LANE too.
>
>Jim
>
>
>--- "Mosley, Arthur" <Arthur.Mosley@wang.com> wrote:
> >
> > Focus on PVC, SVC, and Classical IP. I wouldn't
> > worry too much about LANE.
> >
> > I think they will be pretty specific on what they
> > are looking for.
> >
> > art
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rich Parsons
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Sent: 3/14/00 3:49 PM
> > Subject: ATM
> >
> > Hello all,
> > Do any of you have an idea of how the ATM
> > questioning might guide an
> > individual to realize "what" the test is asking?
> > I'm thinking Cisco
> > won't
> > just come out and ask to configure a PVC, SVC or
> > LANE.... Are there any
> > good guidelines, catch words to go by? Thanks
> >
> > Rich
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:06 GMT-3