From: Kevin Gannon (kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 18 2000 - 14:39:15 GMT-3
I have a simple irb setup where off a routed serial interface I have a
bridged segment 14.14.14.0/24
and of a routed segment I have an address 16.16.16.0/24. I have run up
EIGRP over the routed link.
What I find strange is that I can ping from 16.16.16.3 the far routed
link end point to 14.14.14.2 the far
bridged link endpoint. Yet the router with the bridged only config has
no default route .
The way O think that it is working is that when I ping from the
bridged side of the link the packet
just gets forwarded (initally flooded) up the link it hits the bridge
side of the BVI and then a routing
decsion is made by the router based on the EIGRP routes. On the way
back from the routed side
the router has an EIGRP route for 14.14.14/24 based on the BVI
address. When the BVI gets the
packet it bridges it down the birdged link.
I just want a sanity check on the above.
Regards,
Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:05 GMT-3