From: David Goldsmith (dgoldsmi@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2000 - 17:44:51 GMT-3
Greg,
You can form an adj. to a secondary, but not a secondary only......
Dave G.
LASSERRE Grégory wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> i've not made the test but i don't think so.
>
> The problem is that the router cannot make any adjency
> on the secondary interface, because all IP packets sent by
> this interface systematically carry the Primary IP Address as
> source address.
>
> Thus, OSPF adjency cannot be made with another neighbor on this
> secondary IP network (even if "ip ospf neighbor" is configured on both
> routers)
>
> Greg.
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De: Ben_J_Durand@tivoli.com [SMTP:Ben_J_Durand@tivoli.com]
> > Date: mercredi 15 mars 2000 16:38
> > À: LASSERRE Grégory
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Objet: RE: OSPF and Secondary Addresses
> >
> >
> >
> > Can this be countermanded by forcing a "neighbor" statement in the ospf
> > definition?
> >
> > - Ben
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > LASSERRE Gr<< Fichier: ATT18987.txt>><< Fichier: ATT18988.txt>><< Fichier:
> > ATT18989.txt>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:05 GMT-3