From: Joel W. Ekis (jekis@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 14 2000 - 09:59:53 GMT-3
When DDR for SNA was introduced, dynamic referred to SNA sessions over some swi
tched line (i.e. ISDN). You were given the ability to set the keepalives to 0,
thus allowing the ISDN line to go down without disrupting DLSW. The routers i
n question do not have to be promiscuous.
PoD was developed for supporting the concept of DLSW Border Peers. A peer is e
stablished only when SNA traffic needs to be sent. Here you would have promisc
uous routers.
Joel
At 11:06 AM 3/14/2000 +0800, Winston Goh Tian Keong, NS, SCS-Networks wrote:
>Hi Chuck,
>i am open to correction, i think they both refer to dlsw router in
>promiscous mode. Router in this mode are open to any dlsw peer connection
>making it dynamic and on-demand. Since connection is only made when require.
>cheers
>winston goh
>
>> ----------
>> From: Charles Wolfe[SMTP:WOLFEC@gunet.georgetown.edu]
>> Reply To: Charles Wolfe
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 10:32 AM
>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: DLSW Peer-on-demand
>>
>> Group,
>>
>> Is DLSW "Peer-on-Demand" the same as "Dynamic Peers"?
>>
>> If not could someone please explain the P-O-D situation.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Chuck
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:05 GMT-3